Mobile musings: the Google, the Bad and the Ugly
By now, you all know the big G (thatโs Google) has called time on websites that, when viewed on a device, are simply smaller versions of whatโs seen on a big screen. All because mobile is increasingly becoming the way we consume the internet.
Flying Soloโs stats are proof of this changing landscape. Four years ago, about 5% of visitors came from a mobile device. Fast forward to May 2015, and that number is 35% and growing. Yet up until last week, our mobile web presence brought tears to my eyes, and not in a good way.
Our site needed dramatic simplifying in order to be mobile friendly. It wasnโt an easy process, but through the months of suffering I held fast to the writerโs adage: โThis will make a useful story.โ
So now itโs time for that useful story. If you too need to scale down to stay friends with Google, here are three things we learned that you might want to keep in mind:
Add-ons, plug-ins, bells and whistles: when you build a website, you have so many options itโs easy to end up with the equivalent of Homer Simpsonโs car of the future. But the worldโs most successful sites are full of white space. Full of it! Think Apple. Mashable. And the big G itself. Busy websites now look dated so sticking with a โless is moreโ philosophy will serve you best.
If youโre starting with an existing site, chances are youโre going to have to roll up your sleeves and start feature-chopping. I know how painful this can be! Our new website required we cut a swathe through the old site, which had become very cluttered over the years. We had to pay thorough attention to each and every element and ask โdo we have to have this?โ Losing features we were fond of was painful (but necessary) and we didnโt always agree about what should stay and what should go. At these times, the good old two-out-of-three rule won out (a rule that found Peter consistently making the call!). If you canโt decide what to omit, seek the opinion of a trusted friend or customer.
Googleโs decision is a big win for lovers of simplicity. But a clean looking site can jar against long-winded, poorly presented posts. So if you do any kind of writing for your website, it is my highest recommendation that you have that writing edited.
I am such a strong believer in the power of editing and have never seen a piece of written work that hasnโt been improved by a second pair of eyes and a red pen (this piece is no exception). You need not necessarily involve another person: sleeping on it and reviewing the next day is a great method for the cash or time poor.
Whether you go from 600 to 450 words, or 2,000 to 1,600, a well-edited piece of work shows respect for your audience and for the idea youโre trying to share.
If youโre unsure where to hack away, Iโm consistently observing (as are colleagues whoโve held the editing post), that a majority of tidying occurs in the first 30%. So the very beginning is a very good place to start.
For me, all of the above is a reflection that weโre continually marching towards always on-ness, and I feel sad about that. Call me an old duffer, but I try and keep my mobile devices out of armโs reach at home, and will only use it when out and about. When I realised there were mornings when the first time our young kids saw me, I was on my mobile, I banned them from the bedroom. And theyโre also a definite no-no at the table.
This sets a good example to my kids, I reckon, but a good example of what? Someone who belongs in a museum?
Whatโs your take on the ethics of mobile usage? Is it even a conversation anymore?
Comments