Case study: How to work less and make more
According to the Pareto principle (aka the 80/20 rule), 20% of the invested input is responsible for 80% of the results obtained.
If you take it one step further and apply the rule to itself, 4% of what you do generates 64% of your results.
How wild is that?
Isnโt it liberating to know you can coast by doing very few things as long as theyโre the right things and youโre doing them well?
Most of my clients are working more than 60 hours a week when they first come to me. We usually discover they can immediately reduce that to 30 hours a week and still make the same income. Theyโre always so relieved when I help them identify what they can do less of, rather than what they should do more of.
That was certainly the case with Jarrod.
I met Jarrod Robinson in 2015 and was immediately impressed. Heโs a very switched on guy. He was highly motivated and very hard workingโmuch like the kind of person Iโd expect to be reading this article.
Iโll never forget sitting with Jarrod as he told me everything he was doing.
He was a full-time Physical Education (PE) teacher and had a website/blog called The PE Geek. He started monetising the site by selling an e-book. Then he made this connection:
If one product = good
Then many products = better
So he went from one e-book to eight. He got each one translated into three languages, giving him 24 e-books all up.
Then he started building iPhone apps. One app quickly became 60. He turned 20 of them into Android apps. While some did well, most didnโt. But Jarrod didnโt care because:
Many products = better
Youโd think that 24 e-books and 80 apps would be enough. But not for Jarrod. He built four software-as-a-service (SaaS) products, each requiring a minimum investment of $30,000.
He also had a live workshop product that was popular around the world. Heโd fly overseas on weekends to deliver his workshop, and then fly home in time for school to start on Monday.
Are you tired yet? Because Jarrod wasnโt.
He produced ten video courses.
He launched a podcast and quickly built it up to 40 episodes.
He created a t-shirt range because โฆ well, why not? Teachers need t-shirts, right?
He created a comic book.
Finally, he created his piรจce de rรฉsistanceโa music album. For teachers.
And he did it all while working full-time as a PE teacherโa job that involved a four-hour daily commute.
When he finished telling me all this, he looked at me expectantly. I guess he was waiting for the same response he always got: โWhoa man, thatโs incredibleโ.
What I actually said was, โJarrod, you need helpโ.
And I didnโt mean, โYou need to hire some staffโ. No, I meant he needed someone to help him identify which of the million things he was doing were actually worth the time he was spending on them.
Fortunately for Jarrod, this was my specialty.
The first thing I did was calculate his EHR.
EHR stands for Effective Hourly Rate and the formula is this:
Profit (income less expenses)
divided by
Hours worked to achieve that profit
I like EHR as a metric because itโs a fast way to cut through vanity metrics and figure out if the time spent on something is actually worthwhile.
Jarrodโs PE Geek โside-hustleโ was generating a profit of $250,000 a year. Not bad money, right? The thing was, he was working 5,000 hours a year to make it.
Five. Thousand. Hours.
Thatโs an EHR of $50/hour, which seems reasonable until you realise:
It was time to reduce the number of hours Jarrod was working while maintaining profits where they were. It was time to focus on the 4% activities in his business and life โ the ones that would generate 64% of results.
Hereโs what I got Jarrod to do:
Jarrod felt he needed to keep working as a PE teacher because it gave him credibility with the people he was servicing. I asked him to consider whether heโd have a more positive impact on those peopleโs lives if he got out of the classroom. Getting rid of his teaching job immediately freed up 60 extra hours a week. (Yes, it also brought about a reduction in income, but weโll take care of that in a second.)
Next, I asked Jarrod why he needed to limit the class sizes of his live workshops to 20 people. Those live workshops were his most lucrative product. By capping the class sizes at 20 heโd put a ceiling on the income he could make from them. To fix this, Jarrod opened up 20 more spots in each workshop. And he sold them all. So now he was making twice as much from his workshops.
Finally, I asked Jarrod why he thought he was the only one who could deliver this live training. Yes, there was a certain amount of expertise only he could bring to the table. But when he hired other experts to deliver his training he realised they had levels of expertise he didnโt have. They could give workshop attendees the same positive impact but in a different way.
We drilled deeper into Jarrodโs various offerings and worked out the EHR of each one. Some of them had a negative EHR and were actually costing him money! Getting rid of those products and services was an easy decision to make.
In the end, we got rid of everything except the stuff that was providing the most valueโboth to Jarrod and to his audience.
Jarrodโs live workshops were his best leveraged and best EHR product. How could he amplify their effect?
Iโve already mentioned one wayโdelivering them to 40 people at a time rather than 20.
Next, he identified his most highly engaged followers around the world and emailed them to see if theyโd be interested in him running a workshop at their school. The result? An all-expenses-paid world tour where he delivered workshops in more than ten countries over six months.
Itโs always hard to leverage the selling of one-time products. Why? Because youโre selling to a new person every time. I suggested Jarrod combine all his one-time products in place and make them available via a monthly membership.
Why would someone who only wants one or two of those products join up? For the same reason you have a Netflix subscription but watch only a tiny percentage of the shows on offer.
When Jarrod combined all his products into a membership where people paid a monthly or yearly subscription, everything changed. It allows him to focus on providing excellent value to his current (and best) customers instead of constantly chasing after new ones.
Jarrod was very good at delivering his live workshops. Was he the only one who could deliver his workshops at his level? Yes. Did attendees need someone who could deliver at that level? No.
One thing a lot of business owners struggle with is letting others do the jobs they do wellโespecially when they enjoy doing them.
But doing those jobs yourself rather than outsourcing them to others stops you from:
Hiring other people to deliver his workshops didnโt mean Jarrod couldnโt deliver them himself. It just meant he didnโt have to, which gave him freedom to explore other opportunities for his business (and his life).
The craziest thing Jarrod told me was that he was knocking back the chance to deliver live workshops because he didnโt have the time.
Those live workshops had an EHR of around $1,500. And yet he was turning them down in favour of work that had an EHR of $50 or less.
Jarrod now uses EHR as a highly effective filter. He measures any new opportunity that comes his way against a benchmark of $300/hour. If it doesnโt stack up, he doesnโt take it on.
Today, Jarrod makes more than half a million dollars a year and works around 25 hours a week. His current EHR is $380. He has a lot more leisure time at his disposal and can actually enjoy the money heโs making.
Even better, he and his partner have just had a baby and he gets to be highly present in the early months of his first childโs life.
Thatโs a privilege most new fathers only dream of.
How can you apply the power of 64:4 to your business? Just follow these steps:
Which activities in your business are lowering your overall EHR? If you share them in the comments below I suspect weโll start to see a pattern emerge!ย
—
The above is an edited extract from James Schramkoโs book Work Less, Make More: The counter-intuitive approach to building a profitable business, and a life you actually love. It is re-published here with full permission of the author.
Comments