Pricing for wimps: Should I give a quantity discount?
Has a client ever asked you for a quantity discount?
If so, the client might have said something like this: โIโd like to commit to buying 20 hours of your time every month, for one year; but rather than pay your usual rate of $150 per hour, Iโll give you a rate of $100 per hour. Deal?โ
Gulp.
On the one hand, you think it would be great to have regular work and regular cash flow. It would certainly ease your soloist worry of where the next dollar will come from. Plus it would save you marketing time โ 20 hours a month that you donโt have to go and find: phew. Then thereโs also the 20 hours the client will purchase in the December Dearth-of-Work Zone. This is starting to sound like a great deal!
But then you get a little nagging voice in your head. โBut what if I get busy? What if I have to turn down work that pays a great hourly rate because Iโm committed to my $100-per-hour client? What if I want to take a big holiday? What if I donโt enjoy the work?โ
Itโs not an easy decision.
A good way to approach the quantity discount dilemma is to calculate the โopportunity costโ of taking on the job. There are all sorts of ways to do this, but you can keep it simple with a little bit of common sense.
The first step is to work out how many hours per month โ at your full rate โ would you lose by taking on this client?
Letโs say, in the above example, that you would have to say โnoโ to about 10 hours per month of $150-per-hour work (at no marketing cost).
If you accepted the โquantityโ work then you would be giving up a likely 120 hours of work worth $18,000 (10*12*$150) for the security of a locked-in 200 hours work earning $24,000. It then just becomes a question of choice โ are you prepared to work the extra 80 hours, at an effective rate of $75 per hour (calculated as $6000/80 hours) for the peace-of-mind of regular income?
How about a different scenario. Say you thought that by spending $5000 on marketing you could probably fill the 20 hours with $150-per-hour work, but only for 11 months of the year (December would still be empty).
If you opted for the โquantityโ work then you would be trading a probable 220 hours of work worth $28,000 ($20*$150*11 less $5000) for a committed 240 hours of work for $24000. So youโd effectively be accepting less money and working more hours, but youโd have the security of knowing the work exists.
These decisions arenโt easy but if you do the calculations you do at least get a sense of what the options are costing you. And itโs worth doing; I know a few fabulous soloists whoโve discovered that the โquantityโ client has cost them dear.
Of course, there are other things to add into the mix that canโt be measured, such as whether itโs an interesting project and a good client to work for. Or whether having done that project will benefit you in the future.
Ultimately, your answer might be something like this: โYes, Iโm happy to work 80 hours at an effective rate of $75 an hour to earn an extra $6000, because the total contract assures me $24,000 of work, itโs a good client, I like the work, and โ overall, itโs worth it to me.โ
Have you ever offered a quantity discount and was it the right decision?
Read the full ‘Pricing for wimps’ series:
Comments